According to NCGS 8-50.2, what happens if statutory requirements for speed measuring instrument reliability are met?

When statutory requirements for speed measuring instrument reliability are met, the results obtained from such an instrument cannot be challenged for reliability. This means that if the instrument adheres to the legal standards set forth in NCGS 8-50.2, it serves as a reliable source of evidence in legal contexts, such as traffic citations. The law establishes a presumption of accuracy and reliability for the results generated by these instruments, thereby streamlining the prosecution of speed-related offenses.

Indeed, having met the statutory requirements offers a defense against disputes regarding questionable reliability. This furthers the principle of ensuring that properly calibrated and maintained devices are used in enforcement, thereby strengthening the integrity of traffic law enforcement procedures.

The other options either contradict the framework established by NCGS 8-50.2 or focus on aspects that are not directly relevant to the question of reliability as defined in the statute. Thus, the assertion that results cannot be challenged for reliability stands as the correct interpretation of the law in this context.